[Slackbuilds-users] LibreOffice MD5SUM error

[l***@beauxbead.com]

Hello,

I get an "MD5SUM error" when trying to build LibreOffice 6.1.3.2
(source package, not the binary repackage).

It seems to download the source files, but then I get this error (after
9 previous similar tries...)


--2018-11-12 08:46:28--
ftp://slackware.uk/sbosrcarch/by-md5/4/e/4eb80dfef22ba0b6f3c1c9cdc6dd8e/libreoffice-6.1.3.2-srcs.tar.xz
(try:10) => 'libreoffice-6.1.3.2-srcs.tar.xz'
Connecting to slackware.uk|91.109.244.240|:21... connected.
Error in server response. Closing.
Retrying.

--2018-11-12 08:46:38--
ftp://slackware.uk/sbosrcarch/by-md5/4/e/4eb80dfef22ba0b6f3c1c9cdc6dd8e/libreoffice-6.1.3.2-srcs.tar.xz
(try:11) => 'libreoffice-6.1.3.2-srcs.tar.xz'
Connecting to slackware.uk|91.109.244.240|:21... connected.
Error in server response. Closing.
Retrying.

--2018-11-12 08:46:48--
ftp://slackware.uk/sbosrcarch/by-md5/4/e/4eb80dfef22ba0b6f3c1c9cdc6dd8e/libreoffice-6.1.3.2-srcs.tar.xz
(try:12) => 'libreoffice-6.1.3.2-srcs.tar.xz'
Connecting to slackware.uk|91.109.244.240|:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD (1)
/sbosrcarch/by-md5/4/e/4eb80dfef22ba0b6f3c1c9cdc6dd8e ...
No such directory
'sbosrcarch/by-md5/4/e/4eb80dfef22ba0b6f3c1c9cdc6dd8e'.

Unable to download/verify source file(s) for LibreOffice:
md5sum failure for /usr/sbo/distfiles/libreoffice-6.1.3.2-srcs.tar.xz.


Any ideas? Thanks!

- krt
_______________________________________________
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-***@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

[o***@fredslev.dk]

The download link for sourceforge listed on the SBo page works for me.
_______________________________________________
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-***@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

[l***@beauxbead.com]

Post by o***@fredslev.dk
The download link for sourceforge listed on the SBo page works for me.

Yep, works for me too. However, SourceForge does not provide any
MD5sums that I can see. Downloading is not my issue.

Maybe I'm just being a stickler here, but what is the purpose of
providing MD5sums if they are incorrect? How am I supposed to verify
that my download wasn't corrupted? I'm not being paranoid here,
sometimes my connection is spotty enough to wind up with a bad download,
and I'm just in the habit of verifying checksums whenever they are
provided.

Sure, I can download and build. I was just pointing out a tiny error
that maybe someone could fix and address. I HOPE I'm not the only one
that verifies the checksums, but maybe I am?

- krt

_______________________________________________
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-***@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

[Christoph Willing]

Post by o***@fredslev.dk
The download link for sourceforge listed on the SBo page works for me.

Yep, works for me too.  However, SourceForge does not provide any
MD5sums that I can see.  Downloading is not my issue.
Maybe I'm just being a stickler here, but what is the purpose of
providing MD5sums if they are incorrect?  How am I supposed to verify
that my download wasn't corrupted?  I'm not being paranoid here,
sometimes my connection is spotty enough to wind up with a bad download,
and I'm just in the habit of verifying checksums whenever they are
provided.
Sure, I can download and build.  I was just pointing out a tiny error
that maybe someone could fix and address.  I HOPE I'm not the only one
that verifies the checksums, but maybe I am?

I apologise for the incorrect MD5SUM entry which I failed to update for
the latest version. The correct MD5SUM for that particular file is
6c4eb80dfef22ba0b6f3c1c9cdc6dd8e which will be fixed in the next round
of updates.

chris
_______________________________________________
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-***@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slac

[l***@beauxbead.com]

On 2018-11-13 00:08, Christoph Willing wrote:

...

Post by Christoph Willing
I apologise for the incorrect MD5SUM entry which I failed to update for
the latest version. The correct MD5SUM for that particular file is
6c4eb80dfef22ba0b6f3c1c9cdc6dd8e which will be fixed in the next round
of updates.
chris

Thank you kindly, and extra thanks for providing the correct MD5sum, it
is MUCH appreciated!

respect,

- krt
_______________________________________________
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-***@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

[Willy Sudiarto Raharjo]

Post by o***@fredslev.dk
The download link for sourceforge listed on the SBo page works for me.

Yep, works for me too.  However, SourceForge does not provide any
MD5sums that I can see.  Downloading is not my issue.
Maybe I'm just being a stickler here, but what is the purpose of
providing MD5sums if they are incorrect?  How am I supposed to verify
that my download wasn't corrupted?  I'm not being paranoid here,
sometimes my connection is spotty enough to wind up with a bad download,
and I'm just in the habit of verifying checksums whenever they are
provided.
Sure, I can download and build.  I was just pointing out a tiny error
that maybe someone could fix and address.  I HOPE I'm not the only one
that verifies the checksums, but maybe I am?

FYI, Chris has updated the MD5SUM in his branch and it will appear in
this week's public update.